Europe | Crimean war

A Ukrainian attempt to retake Crimea would be bloody and difficult

And Western support can hardly be relied on

KHERSON, UKRAINE - NOVEMBER 14: Antonovski Bridge, which is allegedly demolished to stop Ukrainian forces from crossing the Dnieper River as Russian forces withdrew to its left side of the river, is seen after Russian retreat from Kherson, Ukraine on November 14, 2022. The only transportation road from Kherson to Crimea was the Antonovski Bridge. (Photo by Metin Aktas/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
|KYIV

VLADIMIR PUTIN hoped to take over Ukraine in ten days. Nine months later, he faces serious problems holding on to the slice of territory he did manage to seize. Momentum is on Ukraine’s side following two counter-offensives, around Kharkiv in the north-east, and Kherson in the south, that were conducted with a minimum of loss and a maximum of triumph.

But those two victories now raise the prospect of what would be much more humiliating Russian reverses in Donbas and Crimea, territory seized by Mr Putin in 2014. In an interview published on November 24th Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine’s president, reiterated his aim to “return all lands”. This is what Ukrainians tell pollsters they want, but Ukraine’s Western backers are less sure. They fear that an operation to retake Crimea, or Donbas (militarily an easier proposition), might drive Russia to escalate, perhaps even to use nuclear weapons.

This article appeared in the Europe section of the print edition under the headline "Crimean War"

China’s covid failure

From the December 3rd 2022 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Europe

Ukraine is on the brink, says a senior general

An interview with Vadym Skibitsky, deputy head of Ukraine’s military intelligence

Europeans lack visceral attachment to the EU. Does it matter?

In search of the missing European demos


Donald Tusk mulls which of the previous government’s plans to axe

The Polish populists’ projects were often preposterous, but not always